NEW YORK - -One of Donald Trump's stock campaign lines is that the Iran nuclear agreement was “terrible.” I'm beginning to wonder if that's true, but in as ense opposite of what he means. Iran has ended up with a much worse deal than it expected. Remember, Tehran entered the negotiations in the heady days of high oil prices. As the Iranians a re d is covering, it's a new world out there.
Put yourself in Iran’s shoe s. The Islamic Republic got serious about negotiating and eventually signed an interim agreement in 2013. That year, oil was hovering around $100 a barrel. Iran's g reatrival, Saudi Arabia, was thriving, with an economy that had grown about 6 percent in 2012. Spending lavishly at home and abroad, its 2013 budget had swelled, up 19 percent.
Iran, meanwhile, was isolated with a shrinking economy. The real prize, for Tehran, was not the return of its funds frozen in banks in Asia and Europe due to international sanctions (totaling around $100 billion). It was finally getting back into the markets as the second largest oil producer in the Middle East and reaping the riches of the boom. In 2010, Iranian officials were predicting that by 2015, Iran's oil and gas revenues could reach $250 billion annually. That's what they were banking on when making their concessions.
Last month, Iran's oil began flowing into the market place, with prices under $30 a bar rel. Bloomberg News calculates that the country is making $2.35 billion a month on its oil sales. That's not quite the prize that the Islamic Republic was expecting for giving up its nuclear program.
Still, Iran will probably be able to handle the oil bust bet ter than many other pet ro-st ates. It s economy has diversified to some degree and, thanks to sanctions, there is great resilience in both the economy and society, as Moody's point s out. This is not the case in many other large countries that are reeling under the hammer blow of falling oil prices.
Look at neighboring Iraq. The New York Time s 'Tim Arango paints a picture of a country "in the midst of an expensive war against the Islamic State that is now facing economic calamity brought on by the collapse in the price of oil, which accounts for more than 90 percent of the Iraqi government's revenue." He notes that almost 8 million Iraqis depend on government salaries, which cost nearly $4 billion a month. Total oil revenues are now less than $3 billion a month. A senior Iraq politician told me that Iraq might not survive as a nation if oil prices stay low for long.
Around the globe, Venezuela, long mismanaged by Hugo Chavez and his successor, is on the verge of default and worse. The economy sh r an k 10 percent last year. It is expected to shrink an additional 8 percent this year, and inf lat ion now runs at a Weimar Republic-like 720 percent, according to the International Monetary Fund. As The Washington Post's Matt O'Brien writes , "The only question now is whether Venezuela's government or economy will completely collapse first." When asked recently what keeps her up at night, IMF chief Christine Lagarde cited petro-states like Nigeria, where 90 percent of expor ts and 60 percent of government revenue come from oil sales. Surging on the back of this crisis is Boko Haram, which surpassed the Islamic State as the world's most deadly ter rorist group in 2014, killing 6,644 people.
As Nigeria's government battles Boko Haram in the north, it also faces the possibility of renewed violence in the south in the Niger Delta, home to much of the country's oil. At its worst, the southern insurgency the r e shut down half of Nigeria's oil production.
The insurgency ended with a f ragile peace and amnesty for the insurgents in 2009. But the government does not have the ca sh t o fol low th rough on many of it s promises. Now it could end up st ruggling against two brutal movements that could tear the country apart.
There are other oil states, not quite as challenged as these, but most of them with problems. The answer, economists say, is to embrace structural reforms, wean economies away from national resources, and invest in other industries and human capital. That's hard to do anytime, but especially hard when your country is in free fall.
In any event, oil-producing nations everywhere have government s that desperately need cash, simply to pay salaries and meet basic obligat ions. That means they will pump out as much oil as they can, which further adds to supply and keeps prices low. Welcome to the new world of cheap oil and perilous politics.
<
FAREED ZAKARIA>
댓글 안에 당신의 성숙함도 담아 주세요.
'오늘의 한마디'는 기사에 대하여 자신의 생각을 말하고 남의 생각을 들으며 서로 다양한 의견을 나누는 공간입니다. 그러나 간혹 불건전한 내용을 올리시는 분들이 계셔서 건전한 인터넷문화 정착을 위해 아래와 같은 운영원칙을 적용합니다.
자체 모니터링을 통해 아래에 해당하는 내용이 포함된 댓글이 발견되면 예고없이 삭제 조치를 하겠습니다.
불건전한 댓글을 올리거나, 이름에 비속어 및 상대방의 불쾌감을 주는 단어를 사용, 유명인 또는 특정 일반인을 사칭하는 경우 이용에 대한 차단 제재를 받을 수 있습니다. 차단될 경우, 일주일간 댓글을 달수 없게 됩니다.
명예훼손, 개인정보 유출, 욕설 등 법률에 위반되는 댓글은 관계 법령에 의거 민형사상 처벌을 받을 수 있으니 이용에 주의를 부탁드립니다.
Close
x