By Park Song-wu
Korea Times Correspondent
BEIJING _ North Korea’s demand for a light-water reactor is a ``nonstarter,’’ Christopher Hill, the top U.S. envoy to the six-party talks on Pyongyang’s nuclear programs, said on Thursday.
It is the most straightforward remark made public so far since the resumption of the talks Tuesday.
Chief officials from the six participating countries _ the two Koreas, the U.S., host China, Russia and Japan _ held a plenary session, but failed to find a breakthrough. They agreed to meet again on Friday.
No date has been set for the end of this round of talks, the fourth since 2003.
``I don’t want to use terms like deal breaker,’’ Hill said in answer to a question on whether Pyongyang’s demand for the reactor is a deal breaker. ``But a light-water reactor, for us, is a nonstarter.’’
Pyongyang has said that it wants to have the reactor as a way to achieve its ``sovereign right’’ of retaining peaceful nuclear activities such as electricity generation and medical research.
But the U.S. said it cannot allow North Korea to have any nuclear facility, arguing that Pyongyang may transform the electricity-generating facility into a plant to harvest weapons-grade plutonium.
The U.S. delegation held negotiations with its North Korean counterpart for the second day in a row, but the two sides were not able to narrow their differences.
After the end of the bilateral meeting, which lasted around one and a half hours, ``zero visibility’’ was one phrase making its round in diplomatic circles, regarding the future of the six-party talks.
Song Min-soon, the chief delegate from South Korea, said that the door is still open for North Korea to have the reactor in the future.
``We clearly know what North Korea wants to have,’’ he told reporters. ``We have opened the window of opportunity for Pyongyang so that it can have the light-water reactor in the future. The target of this six-party talks is to discuss the process and methods for the North to get what it wants through the window.’’
Senior Seoul officials have said that North Korea could have the light-water reactors in the future when it gains the trust of the international community by returning to the non-proliferation treaty and abiding by the U.N.’s nuclear regulations.
Hill said that Pyongyang has been offered a ``very generous’’ proposal, which he described as something he would not want to see just pass by if he were a North Korean official.
``The deal consists of really a lot of what (North Korea) should want _ security guarantees, a (regime) recognition package, access to international financial institutions, and a very serious energy package,’’ Hill said.
Answering a question on the possibility of calling another recess, the former U.S. ambassador to South Korea said: ``I don’t know. But we are prepared to participate in the talks as far as we believe that the talks are useful.’’
The six delegations convened on Tuesday after a 37-day recess. China announced the intermission on Aug. 7 after failing to reach compromises on the scope of denuclearization and the North’s demand for peaceful nuclear activities.
North Korea was to get two light-water reactors in 1994 as a reward for its promise to scrap its nuclear weapons programs. But the construction works have been stopped since late 2002 when U.S. officials said that North Korea was secretly developing uranium-based weapons program.
im@koreatimes.co.kr
댓글 안에 당신의 성숙함도 담아 주세요.
'오늘의 한마디'는 기사에 대하여 자신의 생각을 말하고 남의 생각을 들으며 서로 다양한 의견을 나누는 공간입니다. 그러나 간혹 불건전한 내용을 올리시는 분들이 계셔서 건전한 인터넷문화 정착을 위해 아래와 같은 운영원칙을 적용합니다.
자체 모니터링을 통해 아래에 해당하는 내용이 포함된 댓글이 발견되면 예고없이 삭제 조치를 하겠습니다.
불건전한 댓글을 올리거나, 이름에 비속어 및 상대방의 불쾌감을 주는 단어를 사용, 유명인 또는 특정 일반인을 사칭하는 경우 이용에 대한 차단 제재를 받을 수 있습니다. 차단될 경우, 일주일간 댓글을 달수 없게 됩니다.
명예훼손, 개인정보 유출, 욕설 등 법률에 위반되는 댓글은 관계 법령에 의거 민형사상 처벌을 받을 수 있으니 이용에 주의를 부탁드립니다.
Close
x